In the tapestry of historical narratives, some scholars dismiss the legendary tales of King Solomon’s miraculous feats, attributing the amassed gold fortune of over £2.3 trillion ($3 trillion) to a realm of pure imagination.
According to the ancient saga, the Old Testament luminary gathered an astounding 500 tons of pure gold from mines, some of which enthusiasts believe still exist today. These mines, as per the legend, yielded a blend of precious metals that added to the opulence of Solomon’s treasure.
However, a discerning British expert challenges this conventional narrative, contending that Solomon’s unimaginable wealth wasn’t a product of legacy but rather a more intricate origin. Furthermore, he provocatively posits an alternative perspective on history, suggesting that Moses may not have been the revered prophet of Israel but, in fact, an Egyptian monarch whose story has been woefully misunderstood and misinterpreted through the ages.
In the annals of archaeological exploration, French archaeologist Pierre Montet unearthed a trove of pillaged grave goods within the tombs of Tanis (depicted), a discovery that has captivated the imagination of biblical historian Ralph Ellis. Ellis contends that these tombs serve as the tangible link to the historical foundation of the legendary King Solomon’s Mines.
A solid silver sarcophogυs, which is part of the treasυre trove foυпd at Taпis aпd пow oп display at the Cairo Mυseυm
Pictυred is a priceless goldeп mask discovered at Taпis. Mr Ellis said there is still a ‘graiп of historical trυth’ to the story of Solomoп’s spectacυlar wealth, bυt iп a far less legeпdary capacity
Author Ralph Ellis, situated by the Euphrates River, proposes that if his theory holds true, Solomon’s treasures might be readily found at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. Ellis suggests that Kings Solomon and David were, in reality, Pharaohs Psusennes II and his successor, Shoshenq I.
He notes compelling parallels between David and Solomon and Psusennes and Shoshenq, even extending to their ancestors and family members. Ellis argues that once we acknowledge these ‘Israelite’ kings as pharaohs of Lower Egypt, the inconsistencies in the biblical accounts become easily explainable.